HDMI Labeling Requirements Promise a Stew of Confusion

from Slashdot:
"In many ways HDMI has revolutionized the way we connect devices. By unifying video and audio into a single cable manufacturers have been able to make their products easier to set up than ever before. Until recently there hasn't actually been much difference in HDMI cables. But things are about to get confusing with the introduction of HDMI 1.4. By the 1st of January 2012 manufacturers of products with HDMI ports won't actually be able to call HDMI 1.4 by its real name. In fact, come November 18 this year those selling cables won't be able to use HDMI 1.4 or HDMI 1.3 to delineate between different products. Instead cables that support version 1.4 of the HDMI standard will have to use one of five different labels. The new labels? Well, as this story explains, they're going to cause a new level of confusion for anyone hooking up a home cinema. Add to this the fact that the HDMI organization keeps the details of its specifications secret, and translation between version numbering and marketing-speak will be well nigh impossible."

Nuclear explosion prank, Scare the crap out of your community.

On June 17, 2007, an intrusion incident occurred on Czech Television's Sunday morning programme Panorama, which shows panoramic shots of Prague and various locations across the country, especially mountain resorts. One of the cameras, located in Černý Důl in Krkonoše, had been tampered with on-site and its video stream was replaced with the hackers' own, which contained CGI of a small nuclear explosion in the local landscape, ending in white noise. The broadcast looked authentic enough; the only clue for the viewers was the Web address of the artist group Ztohoven, which had already performed several reality hacking incidents before. Czech Television is currently considering legal action against the group, and tourism workers in the area have expressed their outrage (since the programme serves to promote tourism in the areas shown).

Source Wikipedia

Eye wear.

I remember a time in the 80's when wearing "Shades indoors" was cool and modern, to just flat out futuristic. Think of some of those videos like afrika bambaataa or the movies Tommy and top gun.

The strange irony here is maybe it really was futuristic.

Now we are in an age of contact lenses and lasik. Eye wear is no longer needed for anything but sports, and industrial eye protection.

Yet we find ourselves one again having to wear glasses to watch tv. But this time for totally different reasons.

With the advent of 3D TV will have  people wearing clunky or bizarrely bad attempt of a modern "futuristic look"to be able to decode the 3D.

Even worse then these 50's fashion faux pas that we are now calling modern.

Most of these are LCD Shutter glasses. Where it can turn the lens from clear to black with a small electric current. 
This is the cheapest right now because it uses a standard TV that can display 120 Hz or better. The glasses alternates between each eye turning off the vision in one eye and then the other in sync with the TV.  This is why these glasses are so bulky, it looks like ex-defense contractors designed them to be rugged.


The other technology that I personally prefer is the Polarized lens system.
There are several of them, some that used linear polarizing filters, and some that used circular.
RealD which I think is the best in the the TV space used circular polarization.

The TV has alternating polarization for each line across the screen.
3D content is the interlaced across the screen.

This right now requires a specialize LCD that I think is only made by one company in limited production right now. Several companies sell TV's based on that same LCD screen.

The the linear polarized system it's much like the shutter glasses but the LCD is over the screen rather the on the viewers face.  When view still needs to wear polarized lenses, but these can be light, cheap paper thin plastic sheets.
Like with the shutter glasses, alternate left and right eye pictures are displayed, and the polarization is changed from horizontal to vertical with each alternate frame.

This has the problem that if you tilt your each images from the other eyes image bleeds over.  Generally some always does with this technology as LCD's can not turn the polarization a full 90 deg and high contrast polarizing filters can be expensive.  Circularly polarized still lacks high contrast, but doesn't suffer the head rotation problem.

In the film space, Dolby's system is the ultimate.  I had actually thought of that when I was 20, but concluded that it would cost a fortune and be fragile. They split each color in the spectral bands, an upper and and lower band for each color, and 2 lenses each calibrated to take in upper red green and blue while blocking the lower band.  They'd have to do it with 3 very specialized and high precision band stop filters, make from thin-film dielectric coatings.
It's incredible technology.

Then consider that it's glasses are rugged, and these filters do tend to be very rugged, and yet the Dolby glasses are.
Just an incredible technical achievement.  I have seen the spectral graphs for these things, wow.

I can't imagine what those glasses must be costing them or how much money they must have put in to developing these.

Next I'd like to write about Augmented Reality and the glasses we will end up spending our lives in just to get around.

What an irony that as we evolve we are force to augment ourselves to keep up, at least if you want to be on the top of the pile.














 

Tearing in to flash video.

Get the Flash Decompiler from Trillix
http://www.flash-decompiler.com/

Get the Any Video Converter from AVC Labs
http://www.any-video-converter.com/

AVC also makes an excellent DVD ripper.


Both tools are free to use.

Wearable Display Using a Holographic Optical Element

See: http://www.konicaminolta.com/about/research/core_technology/optical/mgt_001.html